The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53e5f/53e5fdc480db7b8e0b9f11807e38b5f3bf98c588" alt=""
One critical hat trick the auteurists introduced was the inversion of Hollywood’s taste hierarchies: trash cinema could be art, while serious cinema hollow pretension. I happen to think this taste formation was symptomatic of a larger shift in cinema’s place in a cultural hierarchy and that if the auteurists had not existed someone would have had to invent them. The late 1940s fascinate me in part because I see them as a crucial pivot point in the establishment of this new taste formation. Paradoxically, the period offered the most excessive examples of “serious cinema” because the industry was caught in the tradewinds of a changed place of cinema in American cultural life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd46/6bd463bd475965f1d9f5d2f7d605bbff68bdac7e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69fb4/69fb45535c234d4cfbdec368d18035d17a59bd59" alt=""
Meanwhile, the film borrows from and inverts the gothic blueprint: the creepy portrait... the glass of milk make their appearance, only the tone is turned from horror to romance and light comedy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54729/54729daaad5cc85c8565f00fd7c1db662d156fbc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50396/50396cc30c5cd835f121346f3c8c5392c8c1fe0d" alt=""
By now, someone has likely given a persuasive ideological reading for the preponderance of missing husbands, dead husbands, and bigamists in the cinema of the 1940s. I, too, wonder how self-conscious observers of the time were of the trend.
Comments