Conference Themes

In all the rush of practical considerations, I'd never stopped to think much about the themes for the SCMS Conference. After last year's conference, I complained that imposing a theme led to an increasing number of papers clearly reverse-fitted into the topic. This time around, whether intentionally or not, the organizers seem to have opted to sidestep the problem with vague language:

“SMCS at 50/Tokyo: Mobilizing the Future/Screening the Past,” and “SCMS at 50/LA: Archiving the Future/Mobilizing the Past.”

Mind you, retrospection or prognostication could serve as a focused theme. But in widening the topic into a rubric anyone can speak to (what historical media scholarship is not about "screening the past"?), the organizers are defeating the purpose of a conference theme to begin with. I do wonder if SCMS even needs annual themes, but if they choose to have them, the themes should derive from current ares of theoretical/methodological/topical interest in the discipline(s).  The Screen conference would be a good model in this regard.

What's more, I don't know exactly what terms like "mobilizing the past" or "archiving the future" mean. They sound neat, but are highly metaphorical, some might argue nonsensical. 


Popular posts from this blog

Documentary Symposium: Documentary After Farocki

CFP: Visible Evidence XXIV Buenos Aires

CFP: Symposium on Structural Documentary