tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30690257.post2943627701595830049..comments2024-03-21T04:11:40.462-07:00Comments on Category D: A Film and Media Studies Blog: The Movie PosterChris Caglehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11896423565458620046noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30690257.post-83167320425151351362009-05-31T20:38:31.763-07:002009-05-31T20:38:31.763-07:00Ha! That's a great collage Dan Kremer put up. Remi...Ha! That's a great collage Dan Kremer put up. Reminds me of a 'misleading movie poster' (http://cinemawithoutorgans.blogspot.com/2009/04/misleading-movie-posters.html#comments) I posted a bit ago. It is interesting that the Hitchcock poster is not so different from the posters on Kremer's collage, even with 50 years or so difference between them.<br /><br />I think this <I>Marnie</I> poster is actually pretty interesting in the context of the film. It makes me wonder how much guidance the designer really had in creating the poster... Had they seen the film? Why choose this very specific, complicated moment in the film to represent/market it to people who haven't seen it? And, as you suggest, what might the designer say about it?Matthew Holtmeierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18067293472876044857noreply@blogger.com